now browsing by category
Politics in the United States are growing more two-sided than ever before. As with most things on planet Earth, leaving things in nature to be by themselves and compete against one another is almost always better than intervening, regulating interactions between the two, and closely monitoring their outcome. However, leaving politics to be on their own as they currently stand here in the great United States of America isn’t a great idea.
Why not, one might ask?
Political action committees were upgraded to superstar form nearly a full decade ago as a direct result of the landmark ruling on the Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.
With that ruling – getting into the specifics of the case isn’t necessary for a brief explanation of the results of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission – so-called super-PACs, or super political action committees were effectively formed.
Although no guidelines, rules, or laws were laid down to help political agencies build super-PACs, the aforementioned ruling more or less allowed organizations not directly affiliated with or related to candidates they were currently supporting to throw as much money as they could collectively muster – and this isn’t a figurative means of describing just how much money today’s brand-new political action committees could offer to candidates and their campaigns – at such candidates running for various offices.
This ruling was one of the worst things to happen to the world of politics since the turn of the millennium
Politics are more divided than they were before the aforementioned Supreme Court ruling because of the gross wealthiness of political campaigns across the nation – they could simply run endless hate campaign advertisements and messages against their opponents.
End Citizens United is currently looking to get current Floridian governor Rick Scott in trouble for raising more money than what Florida state laws allow.
Further, End Citizens United has proof that Rick Scott was the chairman of the Republican-affiliated PAC that is funding his run at United States Senator right now.
The PAC that is funding Scott right at this very moment was born in 2015, some half-decade after the Citizens United ruling was published, at least according to End Citizens United.
End Citizens United shared recently that they have proof Scott’s PAC has raised a whopping $78 million.
Visit endcitizensunited.org for more details about End Citizens United.
The Supreme Court’s decision in the Citizens United versus F.E.C changed the American elections landscape drastically. That decision gave birth to the idea that corporations are like people. Now there is little accountability if any at all, the money being spent is unlimited and its sources can not be traced to the last dollar.
End Citizens United is a group that launched in 2016 and is dedicated to campaign finance reforms. The group plans to be a big player in the mid term elections in 2018, and has plans to share tens of millions of dollars to Democratic candidates. The group had raised $4 million from small donors and is on track to bring in around $ 25 million to $30 million. Its core goal is to influence a constitutional amendment to reverse the decision made by the Supreme Court in 2010. In its first month, the group had managed to get 325,000 people to sign the end Citizens United petition and is demanding that Congress pass the legislation.
The group knows that they need more than a million signatures to sign the petition. To achieve this, they have teamed up with the ‘Ready for Hillary’ movement which has four million followers. If these followers sign the petition, End United Citizens will have the numbers. The bill is an amendment bid that has a lot of backing and support. Super PACs have muddied the elections with their billions being channeled to politics. It is time to get legitimacy back into politics and get morals back into our political arena.
The group was established on 1st March 2015, and it has been fighting tirelessly to fix the rigged political system. Electing campaign finance reform champions is where the journey starts, passing state ballot measures and bringing the issue onto a national platform to shed light on the matter. The route to achieving this won’t be easy. It is an uphill battle, but the reward is worth the struggle.
America was founded on principles of hard work and fighting for what one supports. The efforts to overturn the 2010 ruling must start from the grassroots. It has been a while since the country passed a constitutional amendment; no amendment has been done since 1992. It is now time for a change. The group chose to back Democrats and not Republicans as they are leading the fight. Most stakeholders across the board believe that too much dirty money from sources like the Koch Brothers has made its way into politics. The choice has not stopped Republican leaders in Congress from standing firmly against overturning the Supreme Court decision.
There are people who claim that the task that the PAC is trying to perform is a little bit beyond what they can achieve. The CEO of the group says that while they understand the odds stacked against them, they firmly believe that it is possible to change what is ailing the system.
The 2016 U.S. Presidential election may have been won by Republican Donald Trump, but George Soros, perhaps the most famous Democrat donor in history has promised the fight against right wing ideology will continue on time.com. George Soros had already seen the rise in dangerous comments and behavior by Republican candidates for the Presidency and even went as far as accusing both Trump and Ted Cruz of doing the work of ISIS during the election campaign on Biography; the hedge fund billionaire met with leading figures from the Democratic Party soon after the election victory of Trump in a bid to begin the liberal fight back as quickly as possible.
During both 2015 and 2016, George Soros had already made a return to many aspects of life it appeared he had left behind long before when he began funding the election campaigns of Democrat’s for many different state and national positions at http://www.nytimes.com/topic/person/george-soros. After providing around $3.5 million in funding for state level prosecutor elections for Democratic candidates the man who made a lone refugee journey across Europe after the completion of World War II made his major splash with $25 million worth of backing for the campaign of Hillary Clinton. George Soros was courted by all the major Super PAC’s fighting to aid the election of Clinton and other Democrat’s before supplying around $7 million in funds for the Clinton supporting Priorities USA Super PAC.
The role of George Soros within the Democratic Party has always been one that is more than simply a major donor; in fact, many believe the arrival of Soros in the 2016 election cycle inspired many other donors to provide more funding than they would have in the past. Understanding the political situation in the world has been a major part of the business life of George Soros and includes his establishment of the Democracy Alliance group of donors that had planned to meet for a three day event just days after the November Presidential elections. Despite not planning to attend the meeting George Soros changed his schedule to speak on the final day of the event and meet with leading political figures in a bid to make sure the Democrat’s are prepared to begin the battle against Donald Trump’s policies on day one of his administration.